Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40830684›Full record

ArticleHealth economics review2025

Impact of outpatient palliative care on healthcare costs in Germany - an analysis of cancer and non-cancer patients based on health insurance data.

Melissa Hemmerling, Sabrina Schütte, Sveja Eberhard, Katharina van Baal, Stephanie Stiel, Jona Theodor Stahmeyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Melissa HemmerlingDepartment for Health Services Research, AOK Lower Saxony, Hildesheimer Str. 273, 30519, Hannover, Germany. melissa.hemmerling@nds.aok.de.
Sabrina SchütteDepartment for Health Services Research, AOK Lower Saxony, Hildesheimer Str. 273, 30519, Hannover, Germany.
Sveja EberhardDepartment for Health Services Research, AOK Lower Saxony, Hildesheimer Str. 273, 30519, Hannover, Germany.
Katharina van BaalInstitute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Stephanie StielInstitute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Jona Theodor StahmeyerDepartment for Health Services Research, AOK Lower Saxony, Hildesheimer Str. 273, 30519, Hannover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPalliative care (PC) aims at improving the quality of life of patients suffering from life-threatening and life-limiting illnesses. International studies have found that PC is not only helpful for controlling symptoms and reducing hospital stays at the end of life, but also associated with reduced healthcare costs. However, evidence on the economic implications of outpatient PC in Germany is scarce. Accordingly, the current study aimed at assessing the impact of outpatient PC on end-of-life costs, and measuring differences between cancer and non-cancer patients who did and did not receive outpatient PC.

methodsThe study involved a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of statutory health insurance data for individuals who died in 2019 and were older than 18 years at the time of death (34,012 individuals). To explore the impact of outpatient PC on end-of-life costs, three groups were formed: (1) all individuals, (2) individuals with a cancer diagnosis and (3) individuals with no cancer diagnosis. The data were analysed descriptively and linear regression models were conducted.

resultsThe descriptive results showed in the group of all individuals, patients receiving outpatient PC had higher costs in all healthcare sectors compared to those who did not receive outpatient PC. Cancer patients receiving outpatient PC had higher total healthcare costs (outpatient PC: 34,822€; no outpatient PC: 26,343€; p < 0.001) but lower hospital costs (outpatient PC: 17,485€; no outpatient PC: 18,713€; p = 0,004). Non-cancer patients receiving outpatient PC had similar total healthcare costs (p = 0.174) but lower hospital costs (outpatient PC: 11,505€; no outpatient PC: 12,667€; p = 0.001). The regression models showed significantly higher total healthcare costs (p < 0.001), outpatient physician costs (p < 0.001) and pharmaceutical costs (p < 0.001) for patients receiving outpatient PC in all groups. Also across all groups, hospital costs were similar between patients who were and were not receiving outpatient PC (all patients: + 40€, p = 0.808; cancer patients: -580€, p = 0.072; non-cancer patients: + 301€, p = 0.166).

conclusionsUnlike the findings of international studies, the present study found that outpatient PC is not associated with lower end-of-life costs. The results for hospital costs were heterogeneous, but there was a trend towards lower costs for cancer patients receiving outpatient PC. Comparability with (inter)national studies remains difficult because financing systems and access to healthcare services are not internationally consistent. Many studies recommend the early integration of PC. Further analyses should investigate the connection between the time of initiating PC and end-of-life costs.

trial registrationThe main study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (Registration N° DRKS00024785; date of registration 6th May 2021).

Indexed as

CancerHealthcare costsHealth services researchOutpatient carePalliative care

Identifiers

PMID40830684
PMCPMC12366161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.