Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40830678›Full record

ArticleActa pharmacologica Sinica2026

DNMT inhibition epigenetically restores the cGAS-STING pathway and activates RIG-I/MDA5-MAVS to enhance antitumor immunity.

Yao Tu, Qing-Yun Zhu, Wen-Jun Huang, Sha Feng, Yu-Ling Tan, Lu-Lu Li, Xin-Tong Xie, Qin-Yuan Li, Shou-Hui Huang, Cheng-Zhou Mao and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta pharmacologica Sinica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Tuning epigenetics to enhance cancer virotherapy.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yao TuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Ingredients and Gut Microbiomics, School of Pharmacy, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.
Qing-Yun ZhuThe First Affiliated Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001, China.
Wen-Jun HuangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Ingredients and Gut Microbiomics, School of Pharmacy, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.
Sha FengGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Ingredients and Gut Microbiomics, School of Pharmacy, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.
Yu-Ling TanGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Ingredients and Gut Microbiomics, School of Pharmacy, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.
Lu-Lu LiState Key Laboratory of Chemical Oncogenomics, Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Xin-Tong XieDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, Shenzhen Center, Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shenzhen, 518116, China.
Qin-Yuan LiState Key Laboratory of Chemical Oncogenomics, Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Shou-Hui HuangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Ingredients and Gut Microbiomics, School of Pharmacy, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.
Cheng-Zhou MaoDepartment of Anatomy and Histology, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.
Bi-Zhu ChuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Ingredients and Gut Microbiomics, School of Pharmacy, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China. chubz@szu.edu.cn.
Yu-Yang JiangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Ingredients and Gut Microbiomics, School of Pharmacy, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cGAS-STING cytosolic DNA-sensing pathway is a key mediator of the innate immune response and plays a crucial role in antitumor immunity. The expression of cGAS and STING is often suppressed in tumor cells, and reduced expression is associated with poor prognosis and inferior response to immunotherapy. In this study we systematically investigated the expression pattern of cGAS-STING pathway in tumors and its correlation with immunotherapy response. We showed that the expression of cGAS and STING was significantly decreased or undetectable in most breast cancer and murine tumor cell lines, while high cGAS and STING expression was associated with increased T cell infiltration, elevated PD-L1 and PD-1 levels, improved immunotherapy response and prolonged survival. In cGAS-STING-deficient MDA-MB-453 cells, DNMT inhibitor decitabine (DAC, 0.05-1 μM) dose-dependently restored the impaired pathway by reversing DNA methylation-mediated silencing. Furthermore, DAC combined with a chemotherapeutic agent cisplatin significantly enhanced the antitumor effect in MDA-MB-453 and MDA-MB-231 cells by activating the cGAS-STING pathway through cytoplasmic DNA accumulation. In addition, DNMT inhibition elevated intracellular dsRNA levels and activated the RIG-I/MDA5-MAVS pathway. These results suggest that DNMT inhibitors can epigenetically reprogram the cGAS-STING pathway, activate the RIG-I/MDA5-MAVS pathway, and in combination with chemotherapeutic agents, synergistically promote antitumor immunity. Together, this study identifies cGAS-STING as a potential predictor of immunotherapy response and highlights a novel therapeutic strategy for restoring innate immune function in cancer. Loss of cGAS-STING signaling in tumors impairs antitumor immunity and correlates with poor immunotherapy response. DNMT inhibition restores cGAS-STING pathway and concurrently activates the RIG-I/MDA5-MAVS signaling, synergistically enhancing immune infiltration and antitumor efficacy.

Indexed as

DNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesMembrane ProteinsNucleotidyltransferasesAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCisplatinCyclic Guanosine Monophosphate-Adenosine Monophosphate SynthaseDEAD Box Protein 58DecitabineEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleHumansImmunotherapyAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAntineoplastic AgentscGAS protein, humanCisplatinCyclic Guanosine Monophosphate-Adenosine Monophosphate SynthaseDEAD Box Protein 58DecitabineDNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesMAVS protein, humanMembrane ProteinsNucleotidyltransferasesReceptors, ImmunologicRIGI protein, humanSTING1 protein, humanSTING Proteinantitumor immunitycGAS-STINGDNMT inhibitorsepigenetic modulationimmunotherapy response predictorRIG-I/MDA5-MAVS

Identifiers

PMID40830678
PMCPMC12764874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.