ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2026
[18F]F-FAPI PET/CT outperforms [18F]F-FDG PET/CT in predicting treatment response in lupus nephritis.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Glomerulonephritis through the lens of ultrasound and radiology.World journal of nephrology · 2026Review
- Plasma exosomal fibroblast activation protein: a novel biomarker links fatty acid metabolic dysregulation to systemic lupus erythematosus.Arthritis research & therapy · 2026Article
- Expanding horizons: radiolabeled FAPI in imaging of autoimmune diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo identify predictors of complete response (CR) following induction therapy in lupus nephritis (LN) and comparatively evaluate the predictive value of baseline [18 F]F-FAPI PET/CT versus [18 F]F-FDG PET/CT for treatment short-term outcomes. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwenty biopsy-proven LN patients were prospectively enrolled and underwent dual-tracer PET/CT imaging, using both [18 F]F-FAPI and [18 F]F-FDG imaging prior to standardized induction therapy. Treatment response was assessed at 6 months, categorizing into CR, partial response (PR), and non-response (NR) groups. Associations between PET metrics, clinical biomarkers and treatment response were analyzed. Semiquantitative PET parameters including renal standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and target-to-background ratio (TBR) were calculated.
resultsBaseline renal FAPI SUVmax was inversely correlated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and positively with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (P < 0.05 for both), whereas FDG SUVmax showed no significant correlation with either parameter. At 6 months, 50% of patients achieved CR, 25% PR, and 25% NR. Patients with CR exhibited significantly lower baseline renal FAPI SUVmax and TBR compared to those with non-CR (PR + NR) (P < 0.01). Visual assessment of FAPI uptake outperformed FDG in predicting CR, with higher accuracy (85% vs. 70%), specificity (90% vs. 50%), and positive predictive value (PPV, 89% vs. 64%), while sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) were comparable. Univariate logistic regression identified age > 35 years (P < 0.05) and negative baseline FAPI uptake (P < 0.01) as significant predictors of CR. In multivariate analysis, negative FAPI uptake remained the only independent predictor (P < 0.01).
conclusion[18 F]F-FAPI PET/CT demonstrates superior predictive performance over [18 F]F-FDG PET/CT for short-term treatment response in lupus nephritis. It holds promise as a noninvasive imaging biomarker to guide clinical decision-making and optimize individualized therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40830669What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.