Trial reportScientific reports2025
Efficacy and safety of a biosimilar laronidase versus the reference laronidase in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type I.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06406153 (A Phase III, Single Arm, Cross-over, Multicenter Clinical Trial to Compare Efficacy and Safety of YW17), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III, Single Arm, Cross-over, Multicenter Clinical Trial to Compare Efficacy and Safety of YW17(Laronidase; CinnaGen) Versus Laronidase (Aldurazyme®; Genzyme, BioMarin) in Patients With Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I (MPS I)"
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study assessed the efficacy and safety of a biosimilar Laronidase (CinnaGen Company, Iran), compared to the reference Laronidase (Aldurazyme, BioMarin, USA) in maintaining urinary glycosaminoglycan (uGAG) levels in mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I) patients. In this phase III, open-label, single-sequence, and cross-over study, MPS I patients received Aldurazyme for 12 weeks, followed by Laronidase (CinnaGen) for another 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the assessment of mean uGAG levels at the final visits of each medication administration. The secondary outcomes included the assessment of 6-minute walking test (6MWT), predicted forced vital capacity (FVC), enzyme activity assay, and adverse events (AEs). Twelve patients with mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 10.25 ± 3.11 years were included in the study. The mean (± SD) uGAG level was 220.47 ± 177.13 CPC unit/g creatinine at the end of Aldurazyme treatment and changed to 270.02 ± 111.55 CPC unit/g creatinine at the end of Laronidase (CinnaGen) treatment, with variable patient responses. The mean 6MWT and predicted FVC improved by almost 30 m and 13%, respectively. Post-infusion enzyme activity levels showed similar patterns between Aldurazyme and Laronidase (CinnaGen), with no detectable activity before the infusion. A total of 30 AEs were reported during the trial. In the first time period (receiving Aldurazyme), AEs were reported for seven patients (58.33%), and in the subsequent time period (receiving Laronidase (CinnaGen)), AEs were reported for six patients (50%). Among all, nasopharyngitis was the most common reported AE. In conclusion, the biosimilar Laronidase was shown to have a comparable efficacy and safety profile compared with the reference Laronidase.Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT06406153; First registration: 09/05/2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.