ArticleScientific reports2025
Multi-stage framework using transformer models, feature fusion and ensemble learning for enhancing eye disease classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- RetinoMamba-AnatomyQuery: Anatomy-Guided Query Learning for Efficient Vision Impairment Screening from Retinal Fundus Images.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advanced retinal disease detection using RHT-Net: a hybrid deep learning approach with augmented fundus imaging.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eye diseases can affect vision and well-being, so early, accurate diagnosis is crucial to prevent serious impairment. Deep learning models have shown promise for automating the diagnosis of eye diseases from images. However, current methods mostly use single-model architectures, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which might not adequately capture the long-range spatial correlations and local fine-grained features required for classification. To address these limitations, this study proposes a multi-stage framework for eye diseases (MST-EDS), including two stages: hybrid and stacking models in the categorization of eye illnesses across four classes: normal, diabetic_retinopathy, glaucoma, and cataract, utilizing a benchmark dataset from Kaggle. Hybrid models are developed based on Transformer models: Vision Transformer (ViT), Data-efficient Image Transformer (DeiT), and Swin Transformer are used to extract deep features from images, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is used to reduce the complexity of extracted features, and Machine Learning (ML) models are used as classifiers to enhance performance. In the stacking model, the outputs of the best hybrid models are stacked, and they are used to train and evaluate meta-learners to improve classification performance. The experimental results show that the MST-EDS-RF model recorded the best performance compared to individual Transformer and hybrid models, with 97.163% accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.