ArticleScientific reports2025
Performance evaluation of GPT-4o on South Korean national exams for building mechanical equipment maintenance.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluates the applicability of large language models (LLMs) in mechanical equipment maintenance in buildings by assessing GPT-4o's performance on two national certification exams in South Korea: Engineer Energy Management (EEM) and Engineer Air-Conditioning Refrigerating Machinery (EACRM). GPT-4o achieved average scores of 80.6 and 81.25 on the EEM and EACRM exams, respectively, passing all five attempts. The model performed well on both non-calculation and calculation problems and demonstrated high consistency, with an average response consistency of 97%. Despite these strengths, three key limitations were identified: weak advanced reasoning, difficulty in solving legal questions, and poor interpretation of scientific figures. Experimental results indicate that advanced reasoning can be improved using reasoning-optimized models, while legal question accuracy can be significantly enhanced with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). However, figure interpretation remains dependent on advancements in visual recognition capabilities. These findings suggest that GPT-4o possesses foundational knowledge applicable to mechanical equipment maintenance in buildings but also highlight the need to address certain limitations for practical implementation. This study provides a foundation for future research on integrating LLMs into industrial applications, such as maintenance management software, to enhance maintenance efficiency and address workforce shortages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.