ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimized machine learning based comparative analysis of predictive models for classification of kidney tumors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epidemiological Trends and Burden of Adult Kidney Cancer in Saudi Arabia: A 42-Year Retrospective Analysis (1982-2023).Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Observational
- Explainable and reliable kidney CT image classification using self-supervised DeiT-Tiny transformer.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Transformers meet CNNs for insights into breast mass classification from histopathological images.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Development and validation of machine learning models based on blood routine tests and tumor markers in early screening of primary bronchogenic lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The kidney is an important organ that helps clean the blood by removing waste, extra fluids, and harmful substances. It also keeps the balance of minerals in the body and helps control blood pressure. But if the kidney gets sick, like from a tumor, it can cause big health problems. Finding kidney issues early and knowing what kind of problem it has is very important for good treatment and better results for patients. In this study, different machine learning models were used to detect and classify kidney tumors. These models included Decision Tree, XGBoost Classifier, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine (SVM). The dataset splitting is done in two ways 80:20 and 75:25 and the models worked best with the 80:20 split. Among them, the top three models-SVM, KNN, and XGBoost-were tested with different batch sizes, which are 16 and 32. SVM performed best when the batch size was 32. These models were also trained using two types of optimizers, called Adam and SGD. SVM did better when using the Adam method. SVM had the highest accuracy of 98. 5%, then came KNN with 90.4%. This method will help healthcare professionals in the early diagnosis of disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.