ArticleScientific reports2025
Real-world data of CanAssist Breast- first immunohistochemistry and AI-based prognostic test.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CanAssist Breast (CAB), an immunohistochemistry (IHC) and artificial intelligence-based prognostic test, was developed on Hormone receptor-positive (HR +), HER2/neu-negative (HER2-) breast tumors from Indian patients and validated in retrospective global studies. CAB combines the expression of five protein biomarkers with three clinical parameters to segregate patients as low-risk (LR) or high-risk (HR) for distant recurrence. CAB has been in clinical use in South Asia, UAE, Turkey, and Iran for the last 8 years on > 7000 Early breast cancer (EBC) patients. Here we showcase for the first time, the real-world data on the usefulness of CAB to prognosticate across different clinicopathological parameters, histological types, and impact on treatment planning by analysing CAB usage in 5926 patients diagnosed from mid-2016 to 2024. Overall, CAB stratified 72% of patients as LR and 28% as HR for distant recurrence. Interestingly, CAB showed meaningful differences in HR proportions across different histological types; 19% and 29% in mucinous versus mixed mucinous, while 26% and 50% in papillary and micropapillary carcinomas, respectively. In the intermediate Ki67 group, CAB segregated 77% of patients as LR and 23% as HR. In conclusion, CAB is a first-of-its-kind prognostic test that serves as a cost-effective, suitable alternative to Western prognostic tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.