ArticleScientific reports2025
Inflammatory markers guide early risk stratification and prognosis in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inflammaging and cytokine-driven cardiovascular senescence in age-related myocardial infarction: mechanisms, biomarkers, and precision immunotherapy strategies.Biogerontology · 2026Review
- A Multidomain Prediction Model Integrating Myocardial Injury, Ventricular Function, and Inflammation for Short-Term Risk Stratification in Patients with NSTEMI.Clinics and practice · 2026Article
- Inflammation-Mediated Mechanisms of Arrhythmias After Acute Myocardial Infarction.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Prognostic Value of the Osaka Prognostic Score for One-Year Mortality in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Remote ischemic preconditioning in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction and transient ischemic attack: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Cellular Senescence, Inflammaging and Cardiovascular Disease.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) has been associated with prognosis in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients, but data on its role in elderly individuals remains limited. This single-center, retrospective study included 590 elderly AMI patients, who were stratified into three groups based on hs-CRP tertiles. The incidence of adverse in-hospital events increased progressively across higher hs-CRP tertiles (17.2%, 25.5%, and 48%, P<0.001). Notably, patients who experienced these events had significantly higher hs-CRP levels compared to those without adverse outcomes (7.04 [2.38, 20.00] vs. 2.59 [1.06, 6.07], P<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression identified hs-CRP as an independent predictor of in-hospital outcomes in elderly AMI patients (Q3: OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.23-3.97, P=0.008). The area under the curve (AUC) for hs-CRP's predictive accuracy was 0.712 (95% CI 0.664-0.755, P<0.001). Furthermore, integrating hs-CRP into an established risk factor model significantly improved both reclassification and discrimination (Continuous NRI: 0.461, 95% CI 0.292-0.631, P<0.001; IDI: 0.046, 95% CI 0.025-0.067, P<0.001), although it did not substantially enhance the C-statistic (0.867 (95% CI 0.831-0.895, P<0.001) vs. 0.876 (95% CI 0.841-0.905, P<0.001) , P=0.183). These findings suggest that hs-CRP is a reliable and practical biomarker for predicting poor prognosis in elderly patients with AMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.