ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimal time and volume of fluid resuscitation in patients with sepsis: a nationwide multicenter cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The physiologic power of fluid circulation and implications for fluid therapy.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The optimal fluid resuscitation strategy for managing sepsis remains unknown. We aimed to examine the independent and joint associations of infusion time and volume of fluid resuscitation on mortality in patients with sepsis. We analyzed adult patients with sepsis who received > 20 mL/kg of fluid for initial resuscitation within 6 h after the start of fluid resuscitation from prospectively collected nationwide data at 15 hospitals in South Korea between September 2019 and December 2022.The volume of administered fluid (mL/kg) was categorized into six groups (20 to < 25, 25 to < 30, 30 to < 35, 35 to < 40, 40 to < 45, and ≥ 45) and infusion time (h) was categorized into two groups (≤ 3 and > 3). Among a total of 1305 patients, a fluid volume of 40 to < 45 mL/kg with an infusion time of ≤ 3 h was significantly associated with a lower 28-day mortality rate compared with that in 20 to < 25 mL/kg (hazard ratio [HR], 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04-0.87). This nationwide cohort study of patients with sepsis showed that administering a higher (> 30%) volume of fluid than the current recommendation within 3 h was associated with a lower risk of mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.