ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2025
Advances in mitigating methane emissions from rice cultivation: past, present, and future strategies.
Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper analyzes methane emissions from rice cultivation, a major source of global methane (10-12% of emissions), driven by traditional flooding practices that create anaerobic conditions. Before 2000, continuous flooding was the dominant rice irrigation method, promoting methanogenesis and increasing methane (CH₄) emissions. Since then, practices like alternate wetting and drying (AWD), biochar application, and mid-season drainage, have significantly cut CH₄ emissions by 41.37%, 28.97%, and 23.87%, respectively. Financial mechanisms such as carbon credits, the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), and Sustainable Rice Platform (SRP) certification now incentivize farmers to adopt low-emission techniques. These changes in water management, fertilizers, soil treatment, and policy have collectively improved methane reduction efficiency, supporting global sustainability goals. Precisions agriculture (IoT, drones, and machine learning) enabling optimized water and nutrient management. Policy mechanisms, including carbon credits and SRP certification, further incentivize sustainable practices. However, adoption faces barriers like high costs, limited training, and policy gaps. The paper also identifies future directions, including the development of stress-tolerant rice varieties, optimized microbial inoculants, and large-scale trials of AWD and IoT systems in low-income regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.