ReviewMetabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society2025
Analytical greenness metrics for metabolomics.
Review in Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMetabolomics is rapidly evolving, addressing analytical chemistry challenges in the qualification and quantitation of metabolites in extremely complex samples. Targeted metabolomics involves the extraction and analysis of target compounds, often present at extremely low concentrations, whilst untargeted metabolomics requires the use of sophisticated analytical techniques to deal with the simultaneous identification or quantitation of hundreds of compounds. Given the high energy consumption and excessive amounts of waste generated by metabolomics studies, greenness metrics are essential to account for sustainable development. AIM OF REVIEW: To determine the applicability of the Analytical GREEnness calculator (AGREE) in evaluating the analytical greenness of metabolomics methods. Specifically, the analytical protocols of 16 state-of-art metabolomics studies, including nine targeted and seven untargeted metabolomics studies, are fully dissected, and detailed greenness parameters for each procedure are rationally estimated. KEY SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTS OF REVIEW: The calculated AGREE metrics unequivocally show the main weaknesses of greenness in current research, and guidelines for sustainable practices in metabolomics are provided. The results indicate that offline sample preparation and the lack of automation and miniaturization are key areas that must be addressed to make metabolomics more sustainable. Important aspects that should be considered include the complexity of sample preparation procedures, the use of toxic reagents and derivatizing agents, the amount of waste generated, and sample throughput.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40830591What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.