Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40830568›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025

Real time machine learning prediction of next generation sequencing test results in live clinical settings.

Grace Y E Kim, Matthew Schwede, Conor K Corbin, Sajjad Fouladvand, Rondeep Brar, David Iberri, William Shomali, Jean S Oak, Dita Gratzinger, Henning Stehr and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Grace Y E Kim *Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford, CA, USA. grkim0987@alumni.stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2674-6682
Matthew Schwede *Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford, CA, USA.
Conor K CorbinStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1293-9053
Sajjad FouladvandStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford, CA, USA.
Rondeep BrarDepartment of Hematology, Stanford, CA, USA.
David IberriDepartment of Hematology, Stanford, CA, USA.
William ShomaliDepartment of Hematology, Stanford, CA, USA.
Jean S OakDepartment of Pathology, Stanford, CA, USA.
Dita GratzingerDepartment of Pathology, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9182-8123
Henning StehrDepartment of Pathology, Stanford, CA, USA.
Jonathan H ChenStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4387-8740

Funding

Stanford Center for Clinical & Translational Education and Research (Spectrum)UL1TR003142 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI O'HARA, RUTH M · 2019 to 2023
$45.0M
Western States Node of the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (TMS for CUD) UG1DA015815 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Keith N. Humphreys, Philip Todd Korthuis · 2015 to 2026
$24.6M
Center for Undiagnosed Diseases at StanfordU01NS134358 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jonathan Adam Bernstein, HOLLY K TABOR · 2023 to 2026
$3.1M
Measuring and Predicting Appropriate Antibiotic Use to Combat Resistant BacteriaR01AI178121 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI JONATHAN H. CHEN · 2023 to 2026
$3.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003142NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI178121NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA015815NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS134358
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing-based tests have advanced the field of medical diagnostics, but their novelty and cost can lead to uncertainty in clinical deployment. The Heme-STAMP is one such assay that tracks mutations in genes implicated in hematolymphoid neoplasms. Rather than limiting its clinical usage or imposing rule-based criteria, we propose leveraging machine learning to guide clinical decision-making on whether this test should be ordered. We trained a machine learning model to predict the outcome of Heme-STAMP testing using 3472 orders placed between May 2018 and September 2021 from an academic medical center and demonstrated how to integrate a custom machine learning model into a live clinical environment to obtain real-time model and physician estimates. The model predicted the results of a complex next-generation sequencing test with discriminatory power comparable to expert hematologists (AUC score: 0.77 [0.66, 0.87], 0.78 [0.68, 0.86] respectively) and with the capacity to improve the calibration of human estimates.

Identifiers

PMID40830568
PMCPMC12365101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.