ArticleImplementation science communications2025
Explaining the Diffusion of Project ECHO.
Article in Implementation science communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impacting Rare Diseases Healthcare by Case-Based Telelearning: Description of the Dutch Pilot Metabolic Diseases ECHO.JIMD reports · 2026Article
- Innovative Violence Prevention Education for Health Professionals: Project ECHO.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Project Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (Project ECHO), a telementoring intervention in which medical specialists share knowledge with medical generalists, has spread to many sites during its 22 years, reaching providers in nearly 200 countries. Based on our familiarity with the ECHO Institute, its practices, and our work with ECHO implementers at many sites, we explain the diffusion of this telehealth intervention in which medical specialists and generalist providers mentor each other in delivering specialty care to patients. We find the diffusion of Project ECHO to be well-accounted for by traditional factors including the perceived attributes of the ECHO model, the status of prominent ECHO adopters, and the inter-organizational environment within which the model arose. We also identify aspects of the ECHO model that have not always figured prominently in studies of diffusion but likely stimulated diffusion in this case. These include charismatic leadership, model elasticity, optional evaluation, and bounded elasticity. The Project ECHO experience can inform the decisions by proponents of other health care innovations to accelerate and broaden diffusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.