Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40830514›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2025

Transforming sepsis management: AI-driven innovations in early detection and tailored therapies.

Praveen Papareddy, Thamar Jessurun Lobo, Michal Holub, Hjalmar Bouma, Jan Maca, Nils Strodthoff, Heiko Herwald

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Cell death in sepsis: unveiling new perspectives on organ dysfunction.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Praveen PapareddyDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Biomedical Center, Lund University, BMC C14, Lund, Sweden.
Thamar Jessurun LoboDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Michal HolubDepartment of Infectious Diseases, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Military University Hospital Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Hjalmar BoumaDepartments of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Acute Care and Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jan MacaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, University Hospital Ostrava, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Nils StrodthoffSchool VI - Medicine and Health Services, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Heiko HerwaldDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Biomedical Center, Lund University, BMC C14, Lund, Sweden. heiko.herwald@med.lu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide, driven by its clinical complexity and delayed recognition. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers promising solutions to improve sepsis care through earlier detection, risk stratification, and personalized treatment strategies. Key applications include AI-driven early warning systems, subphenotyping based on clinical and biological data, and decision support tools that adapt to real-time patient information. The integration of diverse data types, such as structured clinical data, unstructured notes, waveform signals, and molecular biomarkers, enhances the precision and timeliness of interventions. However, challenges such as algorithmic bias, limited external validation, data quality issues, and ethical considerations continue to hinder clinical implementation. Future directions focus on real-time model adaptation, multi-omics integration, and the development of generalist medical AI capable of personalized recommendations. Successfully addressing these barriers is essential for AI to deliver on its potential to transform sepsis management and support the transition toward precision-driven critical care.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEarly DiagnosisSepsisHumansPrecision MedicineArtificial intelligenceClinical decision supportEarly detectionPrecision medicineSepsis management

Identifiers

PMID40830514
PMCPMC12366378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.