Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40830503›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2025

Empowered yet dehumanized: perceptions of women's attractiveness in the context of gender earnings inequality.

Lijuan Xiao, Lei Cheng, Fang Wang, Junhua Dang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lijuan XiaoInstitute of Social Psychology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China.
Lei ChengSchool of Psychology, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, 350007, China.
Fang WangBeijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Psychology Education (Beijing Normal University), Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China. fwang@bnu.edu.cn.
Junhua DangInstitute of Social Psychology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China. dangjunhua@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGender earnings inequality remains a significant issue in the labor market. In response, women may perceive attractiveness as a potential resource. However, the effectiveness of attractiveness may vary depending on whether it is assessed from a first-person or third-person perspective.

methodsTo explore how attractiveness is perceived in the context of gender earnings inequality, we conducted two studies. Study 1 examined women's self-perceptions of their attractiveness when faced with gender earnings inequality. Study 2 investigated how third-person observers perceive women's emphasis on attractiveness in the same context.

resultsStudy 1 revealed that women reported feeling empowered by their attractiveness. However, Study 2 found that third-party observers perceived women's emphasis on attractiveness as a form of self-dehumanization. Specifically, participants viewed these women as less human, less empowered, more susceptible to sexual objectification in daily life, and less likely to be chosen as friends in the gender earnings inequality context.

conclusionThese findings provide evidence for the perceived empowering function of women's attractiveness as a response to gender earnings inequality while also highlighting a critical discrepancy between women's self-perceptions and third-party evaluations of attractiveness.

Indexed as

BeautyDehumanizationEmpowermentIncomePower, PsychologicalSelf ConceptSocial PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAttractivenessDehumanizationEmpowermentGender earnings inequality

Identifiers

PMID40830503
PMCPMC12366408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.