Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40830494›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2025

Longitudinal CE-MRI-based Siamese network with machine learning to predict tumor response in HCC after DEB-TACE.

Nan Wei, René Michael Mathy, De-Hua Chang, Philipp Mayer, Jakob Liermann, Christoph Springfeld, Michael T Dill, Thomas Longerich, Georg Lurje, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nan WeiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6019-0633
René Michael MathyDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6866-3132
De-Hua ChangDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8787-6782
Philipp MayerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1957-1594
Jakob LiermannLiver Cancer Center Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1445-1940
Christoph SpringfeldLiver Cancer Center Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3843-101X
Michael T DillLiver Cancer Center Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1926-4204
Thomas LongerichNational Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT Heidelberg, a partnership between DKFZ and University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8888-1030
Georg LurjeNational Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT Heidelberg, a partnership between DKFZ and University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9674-0756
Hans-Ulrich KauczorDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6730-9462
Mark O Wielpütz *Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. mark.wielpuetz@uni-greifswald.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6962-037X
Osman Öcal *Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5234-1921

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate prediction of tumor response after drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) remains challenging in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), given tumor heterogeneity and dynamic changes over time. Existing prediction models based on single timepoint imaging do not capture dynamic treatment-induced changes. This study aims to develop and validate a predictive model that integrates deep learning and machine learning algorithms on longitudinal contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) to predict treatment response in HCC patients undergoing DEB-TACE.

methodsThis retrospective study included 202 HCC patients treated with DEB-TACE from 2004 to 2023, divided into a training cohort (n = 141) and validation cohort (n = 61). Radiomics and deep learning features were extracted from standardized longitudinal CE-MRI to capture dynamic tumor changes. Feature selection involved correlation analysis, minimum redundancy maximum relevance, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. The patients were categorized into two groups: the objective response group (n = 123, 60.9%; complete response = 35, 28.5%; partial response = 88, 71.5%) and the non-response group (n = 79, 39.1%; stable disease = 62, 78.5%; progressive disease = 17, 21.5%). Predictive models were constructed using radiomics, deep learning, and integrated features. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the performance of the models.

resultsWe retrospectively evaluated 202 patients (62.67 ± 9.25 years old) with HCC treated after DEB-TACE. A total of 7,182 radiomics features and 4,096 deep learning features were extracted from the longitudinal CE-MRI images. The integrated model was developed using 13 quantitative radiomics features and 4 deep learning features and demonstrated acceptable and robust performance with an receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.941 (95%CI: 0.893–0.989) in the training cohort, and AUC of 0.925 (95%CI: 0.850–0.998) with accuracy of 86.9%, sensitivity of 83.7%, as well as specificity of 94.4% in the validation set.

conclusionsThis study presents a predictive model based on longitudinal CE-MRI data to estimate tumor response to DEB-TACE in HCC patients. By capturing tumor dynamics and integrating radiomics features with deep learning features, the model has the potential to guide individualized treatment strategies and inform clinical decision-making regarding patient management.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticLiver NeoplasmsMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingAgedContrast MediaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Learning ModelsRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeContrast MediaDeep learningHCCMachine learningSiamese networkTumor response

Identifiers

PMID40830494
PMCPMC12366127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.