ArticleHuman resources for health2025
Women in healthcare leadership: assessment of experiences, challenges, and opportunities.
Article in Human resources for health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Women's leadership development programmes and gender equality: a systematic review in healthcare, academia and beyond.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Towards gender parity: An analysis of leadership management teams in Tanzania's health sector.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWomen play a vital role in the healthcare sector, but the level of their involvement in leadership and the related challenges are not well-understood in the Iraqi context. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate women's experiences in healthcare leadership and identify the challenges and opportunities to improve their leadership roles.
methodsThis cross-sectional study was based on a self-administered questionnaire survey conducted from July to December 2024 in Erbil, Iraq, on a random sample of 371 female healthcare staff members selected from healthcare settings. Women's viewpoints and experiences were measured based on Likert-scale questions.
resultsOf the 371 participants, 13.2% had received training on leadership and 27% had been in leadership positions, most as heads of hospital and primary healthcare center units (72.3%), and most evaluated this experience as positive (92.1%). Most of the study participants had experienced a woman as a leader in the workplace (84.6%) and positively evaluated this experience (45.3%), with 13.5% reporting a negative experience. More than half of the participants (58.5%) were ready to take leadership positions. Most participants (69.6%) perceived women as successful leaders, with 63.3% accepting women in leadership roles and 82.8% believing women possess sufficient self-confidence for leadership. Most participants considered offering daycare services for mothers (89.2%) and providing leadership training programs (78.2%) essential opportunities for women to take leadership positions. Postgraduate education [OR = 2.7 (95%CI 1.1-6.3)], working in the directorate of health [OR = 5.3 (95%CI 2.2-13.0)], and receiving training [OR = 6.3 (95%CI 3.0-13.4)] were independent factors significantly associated with taking leadership positions by women.
conclusionsThis study highlights the untapped potential of women in healthcare leadership, with many women demonstrating readiness for leadership roles and reporting positive leadership experiences. Addressing societal barriers through institutional policies and leadership programs, including structured leadership training, and childcare support, is crucial to advancing women in healthcare leadership. Further in-depth investigations are critical to exploring the sociocultural and communal factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.