Trial reportBMC oral health2025
Economic Evaluation of ART and Hall in Primary Molars.
Trial report in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02569047 (ART and Hall Technique for the Management of Occlusal-proximal Caries in Primary Molars), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
ART and Hall Technique for the Management of Occlusal-proximal Caries in Primary Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study reports an economic evaluation from the perspective of the Brazilian healthcare system. This is a secondary outcome of a three-year randomised controlled trial that compared Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) to the Hall Technique (HT) for managing occluso-proximal caries lesions in primary molars. The primary outcome showed that the HT had a higher survival rate compared to ART and the economic evaluation was to test cost-effectiveness.
methodsChildren (5-10 years old) in public schools of Tietê-SP/Brazil, were randomly allocated to either the ART or HT arm. Treatment survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. The economic evaluation considered baseline and cumulative material and professional costs based on the Brazilian National Health System (SUS) perspective. For the economic analysis, direct and indirect costs were collected and calculated. When retreatment was necessary, an incremental cost of only one retreatment per child was considered for the analysis. All costs were collected in reais and converted and reported in euros. A discount rate of 5% was considered and a bootstrap regression was used to assess material costs' dynamics over time (α = 5%). Monte-Carlo simulation generated cost-effectiveness scatter plots.
resultsThe study included 131 participants (ART = 65; HT = 66) and 112 (85.5%) were followed up over three years. Survival was higher in HT compared to ART restorations (ART = 32.7%; HT = 93.4% p < 0.001). The HT (€13.02) cost less compared to ART (€16.79) (p < 0.001 95% CI: -10.07 to -1.87) due to ART higher treatment failure and cumulative costs. Although baseline costs were lower in the ART group, the cumulative cost due to the need for restoration replacement was higher after 3 years.
conclusionHall Technique is a cost-effective strategy compared to Atraumatic Restorative Treatment for managing occluso-proximal carious lesions in primary molars in a school setting after 36 months, particularly from the perspective of the Brazilian public health system.
trial registrationThis trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02569047) on 2015-10-06.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.