ArticleBMC microbiology2025
Prevalence and molecular basis of resistance to echinocandins among clinical Candida glabrata isolates in Guangdong province, China.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Alkylamidobetaines Induced Changes in Multidrug-Resistant, BiofilmingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Recent Outbreaks, Resistance Trends, and Control Measures inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Community-Onset Fungemias: Epidemiology and Genomic Characterization at a Tertiary-Care Hospital in Barcelona, Spain.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInfections caused by Candida glabrata have raised increasing concerns, particularly due to the increasing resistance to echinocandins.
objectivesThis study investigated echinocandins susceptibility trends in C. glabrata isolates and explored the mechanisms driving resistance.
methodsWe analyzed 418 strains of C. glabrata derived from hospitalized patients. Phenotypic resistance was assessed, and genotypic analysis was performed to identify mutations in the hotspot-1 and hotspot-2 regions of the FKS1 and FKS2 genes. Additionally, genotyping was conducted using multilocus sequence typing (MLST).
resultsThe resistance rates to caspofungin, anidulafungin, and micafungin were 5.0%, 3.8%, and 4.0%, respectively, while fluconazole resistance was observed in 9.6% of the strains. Notably, 1.0% of the strains demonstrated resistance to both fluconazole and echinocandins. Mutations in the FKS genes were identified in 11 strains, predominantly in the FKS2-HS1 region. The most prevalent mutation was the F659 deletion (54.54%, 6/11), followed by S663F (18.18%, 2/11). Other mutations, including F659S, F659Y, and S663P, were also detected. These 11 mutated strains were classified into six distinct sequence types (STs), with ST208 being the most prevalent.
conclusionThe resistance rate of C. glabrata to echinocandins has been increasing annually in Guangdong province. Echinocandin resistance is associated with mutations in the FKS2 gene.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.