Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40830411›Full record

ReviewPediatric research2025

Emerging modalities for neuroprognostication in neonatal encephalopathy: harnessing the potential of artificial intelligence.

Vonita Chawla, Mehmet N Cizmeci, Kelsey M Sullivan, Emily C Gritz, Vilmaris Q Cardona, Ogechukwu Menkiti, Girija Natarajan, Rakesh Rao, Ryan M McAdams, Maria Lv Dizon and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Vonita ChawlaDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA. vchawla@uams.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4298-6421
Mehmet N CizmeciDepartment of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kelsey M SullivanDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Emily C GritzDepartment of Pediatrics, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, CT, USA.
Vilmaris Q CardonaDepartment of Pediatrics, St. Christopher's Hospital for Children, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ogechukwu MenkitiDepartment of Pediatrics, St. Christopher's Hospital for Children, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Girija NatarajanDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, MI, USA.
Rakesh RaoDepartment of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Ryan M McAdamsDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Maria Lv DizonDepartment of Pediatrics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
HIE focus group of the Children’s Hospitals Neonatal Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonatal Encephalopathy (NE) from presumed hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (pHIE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in infants worldwide. Recent advancements in HIE research have introduced promising tools for improved screening of high-risk infants, time to diagnosis, and accuracy of assessment of neurologic injury to guide management and predict outcomes, some of which integrate artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML). This review begins with an overview of AI/ML before examining emerging prognostic approaches for predicting outcomes in pHIE. It explores various modalities including placental and fetal biomarkers, gene expression, electroencephalography, brain magnetic resonance imaging and other advanced neuroimaging techniques, clinical video assessment tools, and transcranial magnetic stimulation paired with electromyography. Each of these approaches may come to play a crucial role in predicting outcomes in pHIE. We also discuss the application of AI/ML to enhance these emerging prognostic tools. While further validation is needed for widespread clinical adoption, these tools and their multimodal integration hold the potential to better leverage neuroplasticity windows of affected infants. IMPACT: This article provides an overview of placental pathology, biomarkers, gene expression, electroencephalography, motor assessments, brain imaging, and transcranial magnetic stimulation tools for long-term neurodevelopmental outcome prediction following neonatal encephalopathy, that lend themselves to augmentation by artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML). Emerging AI/ML tools may create opportunities for enhanced prognostication through multimodal analyses.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBrain DiseasesHypoxia-Ischemia, BrainNeuronal PlasticityBiomarkersBrainElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingPregnancyPrognosisBiomarkers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.