ArticleScientific reports2025
Corneal changes in estrogen-dependent breast cancer after hormonal treatment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Secondary dry eye disease in breast cancer patients: a pilot study.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Article
- Design, synthesis and anticancer evaluation of naphthalen-1-yloxyacetamide derivatives against MCF-7 cells.RSC advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aromatase inhibitors (AI) therapy is the treatment of choice for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer (BC). While AIs effectively suppress tumor growth, estrogen deprivation may have negative impacts on the eyes. This work evaluated the anterior segment changes in estrogen-dependent BC after hormonal treatment. This cross-sectional study was conducted on 40 female patients aged ≥ 18 who received treatment for BC. Patients were allocated to two groups: Group A served as the control group and did not receive AIs, while Group B received one of the AIs for BC treatment. Before treatment, there was no significant difference in tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer test (ST) score, and hexagonality. However, post-treatment TBUT and ST values were lower in Patients who received treatment. Corneal thickness, CCT, or back and front elevations were comparable before or after treatment. AI therapy in estrogen-dependent BC patients is associated with significant corneal changes, including potential corneal stress evidenced by impaired tear film function and reduced endothelial hexagonality, while corneal thickness and front and back elevation remain stable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.