ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimizing mobile cognitive assessment reduces administration time while maintaining screening accuracy in older adults.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Growing dementia prevalence underscores the need for efficient screening methods, but lengthy digital assessments often cause fatigue among older adults. To address this, we developed and validated the Digital Assessment of Cognitive Impairment (DACI), a brief mobile application designed to accurately identify cognitive impairment (CI). Initially, 304 older adults (272 healthy, 32 cognitively impaired) completed both a pencil-and-paper Cognitive Impairment Screening Test (CIST) and a full-length DACI. The best-performing CatBoost model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.813, with sensitivity of 0.903, requiring an average completion time of 321 s. Subsequent feature selection identified two essential subtests for a compact DACI. This compact version was then validated with an additional 297 participants (227 healthy, 70 cognitively impaired), achieving improved diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.871) in only 91 s. DACI effectively distinguishes cognitively impaired older adults with minimal test duration, potentially reducing fatigue and improving adherence. By providing rapid, accurate remote assessment without additional equipment, DACI may significantly enhance accessibility of cognitive screening among older adults. Future studies are warranted to validate DACI's feasibility and performance in unsupervised home settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.