Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40830351›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Data-driven organic solubility prediction at the limit of aleatoric uncertainty.

Lucas Attia, Jackson W Burns, Patrick S Doyle, William H Green

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Data-Driven Critical Evaluation of the General Solubility Equation.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lucas Attia *Department of Chemical Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9941-3846
Jackson W Burns *Department of Chemical Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0657-9426
Patrick S DoyleDepartment of Chemical Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2147-9172
William H GreenDepartment of Chemical Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA. whgreen@mit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2603-9694

Funding

DOE | Office of Science (SC) DE-SC0022158DOE | Office of Science (SC) DE-SC0023112
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small molecule solubility is a critically important property which affects the efficiency, environmental impact, and phase behavior of synthetic processes. Experimental determination of solubility is a time- and resource-intensive process and existing methods for in silico estimation of solubility are limited by their generality, speed, and accuracy. This work presents two models derived from the FASTPROP and CHEMPROP architectures and trained on BigSolDB which are capable of predicting solubility at arbitrary temperatures for a wide range of small molecules in organic solvent. Both extrapolate to unseen solutes 2-3 times more accurately than the current state-of-the-art model and we demonstrate that they are approaching the aleatoric limit (0.5-1

Identifiers

PMID40830351
PMCPMC12365040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.