ArticleNature communications2025
Projection of ENSO using observation-informed deep learning.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI for atmosphere-ocean sciences: advancements, challenges and ways forward.National science review · 2026Review
- SST subseasonal-to-seasonal forecasting: A heterogeneous three-path fusion model with wavelet decomposition.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) profoundly impacts global climate, but its sea surface temperature (SST) variability projected by climate models remains uncertain, with a substantial inter-model spread in 21st-century projections. Model-observation discrepancies in ENSO physics contribute to this uncertainty, necessitating observational constraints to refine projections. However, methods to achieve this constraint remain unclear. Here, we show that deep learning informed by the observed response of ENSO SST variability to tropical Pacific warming patterns reduces projection uncertainty by 54% under a high-emission scenario. Specifically, artificial neural networks (ANNs), trained on climate model simulations and observations, successfully capture the real-world ENSO response. Interpretability analyses reveal that replicating observed ENSO physics by ANNs is critical, identifying warming in the far-eastern and central equatorial Pacific as key to ENSO change. A model-as-truth approach further confirms the robustness of ANN-generated projections. By conditioning future ENSO SST variability projection on the ANN-inferred ENSO response to tropical Pacific warming, uncertainty is reduced from a range of 0.59 °C to 0.27 °C. Our results highlight the prospect of integrating machine learning with observations to reduce uncertainty in climate projections.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.