ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Robotic surgical curriculum for medical students: a scoping review.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Student and surgeon perceptions of a robotic theatre live-link within the undergraduate curriculum.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Medical students' perceptions and curriculum preferences for robotic surgery in Oman: a cross-sectional study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Observational
- A Scoping Review of Interventional Radiology Curricula for Medical Students and Correlation with Kern's Six-Step Framework for Curriculum Development.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Review
- Robotic enterorrhaphy model for junior residents: A step closer to the fundamentals of robotic surgery manual skills assessment.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRobotic surgery is an increasingly common component of surgical practice, yet it remains underrepresented in medical student education. While student interest in robotic surgery is high, their exposure is often informal and incidental.
objectiveTo map the existing literature on robotic surgery curricula developed for medical students and to evaluate the extent to which these curricula align with Kern's six-step framework for curriculum development.
methodsA scoping review was conducted using PRISMA-ScR guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched. Studies were included that focused on medical students and addressed one or more of Kern's six curriculum development steps. Dual independent screening and consensus coding were used. Data were extracted and mapped to Kern's framework.
resultsTwenty-one studies were included, primarily small, single-institution pilots featuring the da Vinci surgical system. Most described technical skills training delivered via simulation. Few studies defined learning objectives and none addressed non-technical skills such as communication and teamwork. Implementation was limited with no evidence of long-term evaluation or curricula integration.
conclusionWhile robotic surgery curricula for medical students are feasible and valued, they remain in early stages of development. There is a need for structured, scalable and educationally grounded curricula that introduce foundational knowledge and support student readiness for technology-integrated surgical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.