ArticleJournal of human hypertension2025
Elucidating the causal role of age of menarche, adiposity, lipid fractions, and blood pressure upon cardiovascular disease: a multivariable Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Causal Association Study Between Brain Imaging Features and the Risk of Large Artery Atherosclerosis: A Two-sample Mendelian Randomization Study.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study explores the causal role of multiple correlated risk factors in coronary heart disease (CHD) and ischemic stroke, using Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses with GWAS summary data from both prevalent and incident stroke cases. Thirteen candidate risk factors were considered, including age at menarche, adiposity, lipid fractions, blood pressure, and smoking. Univariable MR identified seven exposures significantly associated with CHD risk, including BMI, blood pressure, LDL, triglycerides, type-II diabetes, and smoking. Notably, HDL showed a protective effect (OR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.72-0.83), while type-II diabetes was positively associated with CHD (OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.05-1.16). For ischemic stroke subtypes, diastolic and systolic blood pressure showed consistent effects across both small vessel and large artery stroke (e.g., DBP OR = 2.27, 95% CI: 1.77-2.89 for small vessel stroke), and HDL again demonstrated protective effects. Multivariable MR (MVMR) further confirmed these associations, though estimates were attenuated. In summary, both univariable and MVMR analyses identified robust associations of lipid fractions and blood pressure with cardiovascular outcomes, highlighting their importance in CHD and ischemic stroke risk across multiple stroke subtypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.