ArticleCommunications medicine2025
A deep learning model to predict glioma recurrence using integrated genomic and clinical data.
Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- TAF15-mediated m5C modification of MTHFD2 RNA reveals a novel therapeutic target for IDH mutant gliomas.Biomarker research · 2026Article
- Integrating Molecular Pathology, Tumor Microenvironment, and Novel Therapies to Overcome Resistance in Glioblastoma.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2026Review
- Multi-Modal Deep Learning-Based Model to Predict Burkitt Lymphoma Recurrence.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026Article
- Multimodal artificial intelligence in glioma management: integrating neuroimaging and hematologic biomarkers for precision oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Adaptive Vision-Language Transformer for Multimodal CNS Tumor Diagnosis.Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGliomas account for approximately 25.5% of all primary brain and central nervous system (CNS) tumors and 80.8% of malignant brain and CNS tumors. The prognosis varies considerably; patients with low-grade gliomas (LGGs) have 5-year survival rates of up to 80%, while patients with higher-grade gliomas (HGGs) often experience rates below 5%. Recurrence is a common challenge, occurring in 52% to 62% of patients with LGGs and 90% of patients with HGGs, complicating clinical management and treatment planning. Currently, no widely available models exist for reliably predicting early glioma recurrence, which is critical for optimizing patient outcomes. Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques have shown promise in predicting recurrence for various cancers, with those utilizing multimodal data sources showing increasing promise.
methodsWe developed a DL-based predictive model with attention mechanisms, gLioma recUrreNce Attention-based classifieR (LUNAR), to predict early vs. late glioma recurrence using clinical, mutation, and mRNA-expression data from patients with primary grade II-IV gliomas from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and, as an external validation set, the Glioma Longitudinal Analysis Consortium (GLASS).
resultsOur model outperforms traditional ML models and non-attention counterparts, achieving area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 82.84% and 82.54% on the TCGA and GLASS datasets, respectively.
conclusionsOur results demonstrate the potential of multimodal DL classifiers for predicting early glioma recurrence. By integrating clinical, mutational, and transcriptomic data from patients, LUNAR enables improved risk stratification. Its consistent performance across two independent datasets underscores its robustness.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.