Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40830260›Full record

ReviewCommunications medicine2025

Challenges and standardisation strategies for sensor-based data collection for digital phenotyping.

Nadia Binte Alam, Mohsin Surani, Chayon Kumar Das, Domenico Giacco, Swaran P Singh, Sagar Jilka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nadia Binte AlamWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, England, UK. Nadia.Alam@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-5235-6490
Mohsin SuraniUniversity of Bath, Bath, England.
Chayon Kumar DasDepartment of Psychology University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3629-1706
Domenico GiaccoWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, England, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7809-8800
Swaran P SinghWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, England, UK.
Sagar JilkaWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, England, UK.

Funding

DH | National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) NIHR200846National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) NIHR200846
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensor-based data collection of human behaviour (digital phenotyping) enables real-time monitoring of behavioural and physiological markers. This emerging approach offers immense potential to transform mental health research and care by identifying early signs of symptom exacerbation, supporting personalised interventions, and enhancing our understanding of daily lived experiences. However, despite its promise, technical and user-experience challenges limit its effectiveness. This Perspective critically examines these challenges and provides standardisation strategies, including universal protocols and cross-platform interoperability. We propose the development of universal frameworks, adoption of open-source APIs, enhanced cross-platform interoperability, and greater collaboration between academic researchers and industry stakeholders. We also highlight the need for culturally sensitive and user-centred designs to improve equity and engagement. By addressing these gaps, standardisation can enhance data reliability, promote scalability and maximise the potential of digital phenotyping in clinical and research mental health settings.

Identifiers

PMID40830260
PMCPMC12365157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.