ArticleScientific reports2025
Integrating advanced neural network architectures with privacy enhanced encryption for secure and intelligent healthcare analytics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- "First, do no harm" in the digital era: examining the practicality of the European Health Data Space proposal and ethical implications of artificial intelligence: A systematic literature review.BMC medical ethics · 2026Pooled it
- Integrating AI-blockchain framework with Spider Monkey Federated Extreme Learning for enhanced healthcare data protection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Predictive modeling for early diagnosis of dementia using sequential data analysis and data mining.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Quantum optimized hierarchical chunk encoding with robust embedding for perceptual integrity and compression tolerant visual data protection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Healthcare data protection in our mutually connected era has emerged as an issue of serious concern with private patient information, which has been exposed more often due to data violations and cyber-attacks. Network structures CNN and LSTM as part of privacy-based encryption method. Research presents neurosis, a new structure, which combines CNN-LSTM architecture with privacy-secured encryption to provide safe healthcare analytics. Depending on the Kaggle healthcare dataset, the model receives an accuracy of 98.73%, which is better than the current functioning. "NeuroShield" includes characteristic-based access control (ABAC), Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) and differential privacy-based optimizations that provide strong protection. To increase the interpretation, AI (XAI) is used on the basis of size, making health experts capable of understanding model decisions. Detailed evaluation accepts the performance of structure in maintaining privacy through providing high-demonstration analysis for healthcare data protection. Organized testing and comparative analysis suggest that neuroshield not only improves data security, but also provides excellent accuracy with better performing results in healthcare analytics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.