Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40830190›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2025

Comparative assessment of healthy tissue oxygenation using near-infrared imaging, transcutaneous oxygen measurement, and plethysmography.

Mohamed El Masry, Runjia Li, Goundappa K Balasubramani, Sashwati Roy, Chandan K Sen, Surya C Gnyawali

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohamed El MasryMcGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 408 Bridgeside Point II 450 Technology Drive, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219, USA.
Runjia LiDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Goundappa K BalasubramaniDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Sashwati RoyMcGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 408 Bridgeside Point II 450 Technology Drive, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219, USA.
Chandan K SenMcGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 408 Bridgeside Point II 450 Technology Drive, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219, USA.
Surya C GnyawaliMcGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 408 Bridgeside Point II 450 Technology Drive, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219, USA. scg92@pitt.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted critical limitations in conventional pulse oximetry, especially in diverse populations. This study evaluates the performance of noninvasive devices for assessing tissue oxygenation in a cohort of 20 healthy individuals, with a focus on device sensitivity, physiological and demographic variables. Tissue oxygenation was measured using devices: spatial frequency domain imaging (SFDI), transcutaneous oxygen measurement (TCOM), wearable photoplethysmography (WD), and pulse oximetry (PO) during baseline, ischemia, and reperfusion phases. Comparative analyses were performed across devices, sex and Fitzpatrick skin types. Among the four devices, SFDI uniquely detected significant differences in tissue oxygen saturation (StO

Indexed as

Blood Gas Monitoring, TranscutaneousOximetryOxygenPlethysmographyAdultCOVID-19FemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedOxygen SaturationPhotoplethysmographySkinSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredYoung AdultOxygenFitzpatrick skin typesHemoglobin perfusionPulse oximeterSpatial frequency domain imagingTissue oxygenationWearable device

Identifiers

PMID40830190
PMCPMC12365204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.