ArticleScientific reports2025
Development of strain specific simple sequence repeats and assessment of genetic diversity in Erwinia amylovora from marker selection to phylogenetic analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Erwinia amylovora is a highly destructive phytopathogenic bacterium that causes fire blight in Rosaceae plants, particularly apple and pear trees. Due to its status as a quarantine organism in many countries, extensive epidemiological and genotypic studies have been conducted to better understand and manage this pathogen. This study presents a novel workflow for identifying strain-specific simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in bacterial genomes, focusing on E. amylovora. Leveraging the abundance of available genome data, the workflow involves identifying single-copy genes via BLASTX searches, followed by SSR identification using the MISA tool and validation through sequence alignment. Utilizing the genome of E. amylovora strain CFBP 1430 as a reference, 27 SSRs within 26 single-copy genes were identified, displaying diverse repeat patterns and lengths. Five genes containing SSRs were selected, offering valuable markers for strain differentiation. Phylogenetic analysis of 114 E. amylovora strains revealed three distinct groups: widely prevalent, Western NA, and Eastern NA clades, in line with previous findings. A comparative analysis with clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) analysis and multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) highlighted differences in marker selection strategies and underscored the need to validate findings using multiple genotyping approaches. While limitations remain due to incomplete nucleotide sequences in public databases, this study advances our understanding of the genetic diversity, population structure, and evolutionary dynamics of E. amylovora strains, and positions SSR-based methods as a complementary tool alongside other established techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.