ArticleScientific reports2025
Reliable models for calculating the condensation heat transfer inside smooth helical tubes of different flow directions utilizing smart computational techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Condensers with helical tubes have received much attention in diverse industries. The optimal design of the mentioned equipment necessitates predictive tools for calculating the condensation heat transfer coefficient (HTC). However, literature models are applicable only to specific operational and geometrical conditions. The current study aims at developing reliable models for the condensation HTC within smooth helical tubes at all flow directions. Two machine learning (ML) techniques, namely Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Gaussian Process Method (GPM) were implemented to accomplish this target. To design and validate the models, 563 HTC data, encompassing a wide spectrum of conditions, were gathered from 10 experimental studies. While both SVM and GPM tools provided excellent predictions, the latter achieved the highest accuracy with mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.