Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40830171›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2025

Dose-response relationship between accelerometer-measured physical activity and depression: evidence from the UK Biobank.

Shuangfa Qiu, Zhenhua Xing

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shuangfa QiuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, China.
Zhenhua XingDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, China. xing2012x@csu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0036-0420

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies on the relationship between physical activity (PA) and depression often rely on self-reported data, with a predominant focus on moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). However, research examining accelerometer-measured PA, particularly light physical activity (LPA), and its impact on depression risk in the general population remains limited. This study explores the dose-response relationship between accelerometer-measured PA and depression, with a particular focus on varying PA intensities and high-risk groups for depression, including women and individuals with obesity. This prospective cohort study involved 90,585 participants with accelerometer-measured PA data from the UK Biobank Study. Total PA volume was assessed using the average overall acceleration (ACC). Weekly minutes of LPA, moderate PA (MPA), and vigorous PA (VPA) were recorded. Incident cases of clinical depression were identified through diagnostic codes linked to hospital records and death certificates. Cox proportional hazards models with restricted cubic splines were used to analyze the associations. During an average follow-up period of 8.35 ± 0.97 years, 1,641 participants (2.2 per 1,000 person-years) developed depression. Depression risk decreased as total ACC reached 30 mg and as time spent in LPA, MPA, and VPA increased to 2000, 500, and 50 min per week, respectively, beyond which no further reduction in risk was observed. Higher-intensity PA, particularly VPA, did not provide additional benefits for depression when total PA volume was comparable. The relationship between LPA and depression risk was moderated by gender and obesity status, with no significant risk reduction observed in women and individuals with obesity engaging in LPA. Device-measured PA across all intensities, including LPA, MPA, and VPA, was associated with a reduced risk of depression, though the reduction was more dependent on PA volume than intensity. A threshold effect was observed, beyond which additional benefits diminished. Nonetheless, MVPA remains recommended for women and individuals with obesity.

Indexed as

AccelerometryDepressionExerciseAdultAgedBiological Specimen BanksFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityProspective StudiesRisk FactorsUK BiobankUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID40830171
PMCPMC12365289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.