ArticleScientific reports2025
Lung adenocarcinoma subtype classification based on contrastive learning model with multimodal integration.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence construction: a review of the bridge between CT imaging features of lung ground-glass nodules adenocarcinoma and carcinogenic driver genes.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurately identifying the stages of lung adenocarcinoma is essential for selecting the most appropriate treatment plans. Nonetheless, this task is complicated due to challenges such as integrating diverse data, similarities among subtypes, and the need to capture contextual features, making precise differentiation difficult. We address these challenges and propose a multimodal deep neural network that integrates computed tomography (CT) images, annotated lesion bounding boxes, and electronic health records. Our model first combines bounding boxes with precise lesion location data and CT scans, generating a richer semantic representation through feature extraction from regions of interest to enhance localization accuracy using a vision transformer module. Beyond imaging data, the model also incorporates clinical information encoded using a fully connected encoder. Features extracted from both CT and clinical data are optimized for cosine similarity using a contrastive language-image pre-training module, ensuring they are cohesively integrated. In addition, we introduce an attention-based feature fusion module that harmonizes these features into a unified representation to fuse features from different modalities further. This integrated feature set is then fed into a classifier that effectively distinguishes among the three types of adenocarcinomas. Finally, we employ focal loss to mitigate the effects of unbalanced classes and contrastive learning loss to enhance feature representation and improve the model's performance. Our experiments on public and proprietary datasets demonstrate the efficiency of our model, achieving a superior validation accuracy of 81.42% and an area under the curve of 0.9120. These results significantly outperform recent multimodal classification approaches. The code is available at https://github.com/fancccc/LungCancerDC .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.