ArticleScientific reports2025
Discovering action insights from large-scale assessment log data using machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study introduces a novel machine learning algorithm that combines natural language processing techniques, such as Word2Vec and Doc2Vec, with neural networks to identify and validate significant actions within human action sequences. Using the 2012 Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies dataset, the algorithm visualizes and analyzes action sequences in a 2D vector space to uncover high-impact behaviors that influence performance. The methodology, validated across two problem sets ("Party Invitation" and "Club Membership"), successfully distinguishes performance groups by focusing on critical actions, leading to enhanced classification accuracy (up to 94.6%) and clustering coherence (silhouette score of 0.491). This approach demonstrates potential applications in personalized education, healthcare diagnostics, and consumer behavior prediction, advancing the understanding of human behavior through digital footprints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.