ArticleScientific reports2025
A Data Centric HitL Framework for Conducting aSsystematic Error Analysis of NLP Datasets using Explainable AI.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The interest in data-centric AI has been recently growing. As opposed to model-centric AI, data-centric approaches aim at iteratively and systematically improving the data throughout the model life cycle rather than in a single pre-processing step. The merits of such an approach have not been fully explored on NLP datasets. Particular interest lies in how error analysis, a crucial step in data-centric AI, manifests itself in NLP. X-Deep, a Human-in-the-Loop framework designed to debug an NLP dataset using Explainable AI techniques, is proposed to uncover data problems related to a certain task. Our case study addresses emotion detection in Arabic text. Using the framework, a thorough analysis that leveraged two Explainable AI techniques LIME and SHAP, was conducted of misclassified instances for four classifiers: Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, GRU, and MARBERT. The systematic process has resulted in identifying spurious correlation, bias patterns, and other anomaly patterns in the dataset. Appropriate mitigation strategies are suggested for an informed and improved data augmentation plan for performing emotion detection tasks on this dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.