ArticleScientific reports2025
Characterization and predictive modelling of quasi-saturated hydraulic conductivity across land use systems in the Northwest Himalayas.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of geostatistical and response surface methodology for estimating soil saturated hydraulic conductivity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the variation in soil hydrological properties-saturated water-holding capacity (SWHC), field capacity (FC), total porosity (TP), and saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks)-across different land use systems in the Semalta watershed of the north Himalayan foothills. Soil samples were collected from four land use types (agriculture, barren land, deodar forest, and oak forest) at two depths (0-15 cm and 15-30 cm). Key parameters were measured using mini-disk infiltrometers and standard laboratory techniques. Statistical analyses included redundancy analysis (RDA), variance partitioning analysis (VPA), and multiple linear regression (MLR) for predictive modelling. Results showed that forested lands exhibited superior soil structure and water dynamics: porosity was highest in deodar (TP: 0.49) and oak (TP: 0.48) soils, while barren land had the lowest (TP: 0.41). Similarly, Ks values were higher in deodar (0.15 cm/hr) and oak (0.14 cm/hr) soils, indicating better permeability than agricultural and barren soils. RDA and VPA highlighted the dominant influence of aggregate stability, bulk density, and soil organic carbon on hydrological responses. MLR models achieved adjusted R² values above 0.90, confirming their utility in predicting soil-water dynamics. These findings underscore the importance of vegetation in maintaining soil hydraulic function and provide a framework for land use planning and sustainable watershed management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.