ArticleNature communications2025
Direct observation of electrostatic charging in 3D printing.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The spontaneous electrification of surfaces and interfaces is a widespread phenomenon that produces unexpected effects in chemical reactivity and mass charge transfer, revealed in abundant literature over the past twenty years. The pervasive presence of electrostatic charges originates from many sources, including friction, mechanochemical reactions, phase change, flexoelectricity, and others. Since fused deposition modeling undergoes most well-known electrification mechanisms, it would be not surprising that 3D-printed objects display large amounts of charge. Here we uncover the hitherto unexplored realm of electrostatic charging in 3D printing, underscores the impact of printing parameters on charge generation in polymers. Substrates, printing speed, temperature, and printing direction each exert distinct impacts on charge buildup, depending upon the material used for printing. We also develop simple protocols employing common multimeters for charge monitoring, while substrates subjected to corona charging or triboelectrification demonstrate effective methods for charge control or mitigation. An original development is achieved by demonstrating the ability to print quasi-electrets, indicating a potential revolution in electret technology. The implications of these findings establish the groundwork for advancements in 3D printing technology and electrostatics, creating new scientific opportunities for a better understanding of matter.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.