ArticleNPJ science of learning2025
Mediational effects of reading-related intermediate phenotypes from polygenic scores to reading skills.
Article in NPJ science of learning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reading is a fundamental human capacity that recruits and tunes brain circuitry subserving several neurocognitive skills. Individual differences in reading-related skills are largely influenced by genetic variation. However, the molecular basis of the heritability of reading-related skills remains narrowly replicated. Genome-wide association studies have enabled the computation of cumulative indices (polygenic scores-PGSs) aiming to capture individuals' genetic susceptibility for a given trait. By using a multiple-mediator framework, we investigated whether the associations between a reading-specific PGS (Reading-PGS) and reading decoding and comprehension could be explained by reading-related endophenotypes (i.e., phonological awareness-PA, phonological memory, rapid auditory processing, rapid bimodal temporal processing-RBTP, and rapid automatized naming) in a sample of 8-year-old French-speaking Canadian twins (N = 328 subjects (87 MZ and 241 DZ) from 208 twin pairs-one child per MZ pairs; males, N = 159). The association between Reading-PGS and reading performance is partially mediated by PA and RBTP. Furthermore, we supported the specificity of the direct and indirect effects between Reading-PGS and reading skills after controlling for the shared genetic variation with educational attainment and cognitive ability. Finally, we uncovered a sequence from Reading-PGS to behavior mediated through sensory processing and phonological skills, supporting one of the most robust theoretical hypothesis underlying reading acquisitions. PGSs specifically targeting reading skills are essential for improved prediction and understanding of the complex etiology through which reading skills unfold during childhood. This will facilitate the early identification of children with a genetic susceptibility for reading (dis)ability at a time when these phenotypes remain malleable to intervention.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.