Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40830061›Full record

Trial reportStroke and vascular neurology2026

Smoking status and the efficacy of remote ischaemic conditioning: a secondary analysis of the RICAMIS trial.

Xian-Wen Zhang, Yu Cui, Hui-Sheng Chen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Stroke and vascular neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03740971 (Remote Ischemic Conditioning for Acute Moderate Ischemic Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03740971 nacompletednot on this map

Remote Ischemic Conditioning for Acute Moderate Ischemic Stroke (RICAMIS): a Prospective, Random, Open Label, Blinded End Point, Multi-center Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeneral Hospital of Shenyang Military RegionRan2018 to 2021Enrolled1,800ConditionsStrokeArmsRemote Ischemic Conditioning treatment, Guideline-based therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xian-Wen ZhangGraduate School, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Yu CuiNeurology, General Hospital of Northern Theatre Command, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4925-1500
Hui-Sheng ChenNeurology, General Hospital of Northern Theatre Command, Shenyang, Liaoning, China chszh@aliyun.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7486-1992

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRemote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) is a potential non-invasive neuroprotective strategy, but it remains unclear whether its efficacy is influenced by smoking status. This study explored the impact of smoking status on the therapeutic effect of RIC in patients with acute moderate ischaemic stroke through a post hoc subgroup analysis.

methodsBased on the data from the Remote Ischemic Conditioning for Acute Moderate Ischemic Stroke trial, 1717 patients with moderate stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 6-16) who did not undergo reperfusion therapy were included and categorised into current smokers (n=505) and non-smokers (n=1212) based on their smoking status. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either RIC (administered twice daily for 14 days) or standard treatment. The primary outcome was excellent functional prognosis at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale, mRS scores 0-1). Multivariable regression analysis was used to evaluate the interaction between smoking status and RIC.

resultsAmong non-smokers, RIC significantly increased the proportion of patients achieving mRS 0-1 at 90 days (69.1% vs 62.8%; adjusted OR 1.487, 95% CI 1.143 to 1.936; p=0.003). Among current smokers, there was no significant difference in the proportion of mRS 0-1 at 90 days compared with the control group (64.1% vs 62.1%; adjusted OR 1.154, 95% CI 0.791 to 1.684; p=0.46). The interaction analysis revealed no significant association between smoking status and RIC efficacy (P for interaction=0.50).

conclusionsIn this analysis, RIC significantly improved the excellent functional prognosis of non-smoking stroke patients, but had no significant benefit for current smokers, suggesting that smoking may attenuate RIC efficacy. TRIAL REGISTERATION NUMBER: NCT03740971.

Indexed as

Ex-SmokersIschemic PreconditioningIschemic StrokeNon-SmokersSmokersSmokingAgedDisability EvaluationFemaleFunctional StatusHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecovery of FunctionRisk FactorsTime FactorsIschemic Stroke

Identifiers

PMID40830061
PMCPMC13151874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.