ArticleBMJ open2025
Correlates of HPV vaccination intention and uptake among Asian American and Pacific Islander populations in the USA: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Human papillomavirus vaccination among Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders: Scoping review and meta-analysis of descriptive and correlational studies.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHuman papillomavirus (HPV) is a major global health concern linked to cancers. Although a safe and effective vaccine exists, HPV vaccination rates are still low among Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) populations. Barriers such as limited awareness, cultural stigma and systemic inequities contribute to this gap. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compile current evidence on HPV vaccination behaviours and related factors among AAPIs to help develop culturally tailored interventions and public health strategies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This review will include descriptive and correlational studies (quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods), examining HPV vaccination intention or uptake among AAPI populations in the USA from inception to December 2024. Randomised controlled trials and intervention studies will be excluded. Databases to be searched include PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane. Study screening, data extraction and quality assessment will be conducted independently by three reviewers using standardised tools. Risk of bias in non-randomised studies will be assessed using Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I), and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist will be used for qualitative studies. Quantitative findings will be synthesised narratively and, where appropriate, through meta-analysis using random-effects models. Qualitative themes will be synthesised to contextualise quantitative results. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this protocol as it does not involve primary data collection. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. Findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis will provide critical insights for promoting HPV vaccination and reducing HPV-related cancer disparities among AAPIs. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420251008431.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.