ArticleBMJ open2025
Near-infrared light devices versus landmark approach for peripheral venous access in the intensive care unit: protocol of a randomised controlled study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06234293 (Near-Infrared Light Devices Versus Landmark Approach for Peripheral Venous Access in Intensive Care Unit), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Near-Infrared Light Devices Versus Landmark Approach for Peripheral Venous Access in Intensive Care Unit: A Randomized Controlled Study
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive management of hemodialysis catheter-related bloodstream infections: a narrative review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Surgical management of an intraluminal thrombus in the external jugular vein: A case report with near-infrared visualization as a useful adjunct.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCentral venous catheters (CVCs) are commonly used in intensive care but should be removed as soon as they are no longer needed to reduce infection risk. Peripheral venous access then becomes necessary, but can be challenging due to oedema. Near-infrared light devices, simple non-invasive tools, may assist nurses in this procedure. We hypothesise that a near-infrared light device (AccuVein AV500) could improve the first-attempt success rate of peripheral venous catheter (PVC) placement in intensive care patients no longer requiring a central catheter. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This investigator-initiated, prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled superiority trial compares the near-infrared light device to the landmark approach for PVC insertion in critically ill patients with an existing CVC. A total of three hundred and eighty patients are to be randomised in two parallel groups with a stratification on centre and anticipated difficulty of peripheral venous access.The study objective is to compare the first-attempt success rate of PVC placement in adult critical care patients for whom a central catheter is no longer indicated. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol and amendments have been approved by the French ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Sud Ouest et Outre Mer II, Toulouse, France, number 2023-A00429-36), and patients are included after informed consent. The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT06234293.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.