ArticleBMJ open2025
Medical insurance integration and rural-urban benefit disparities, 2006-2021: evidence from quasi-natural experiments in China.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the impact of China's medical insurance integration policy on urban-rural disparities in medical insurance benefit levels, explore its heterogeneous effects in regions with different economic development levels and provide empirical evidence for promoting health equity.
designRetrospective panel data analysis using a quasi-natural experiment. Causal inference was conducted using propensity score matching-staggered difference in differences (PSM-staggered DID) method with time-varying policy variables.
settingProvincial-level analysis covering 31 provinces in China, using administrative data from 2006 to 2021.
participants31 Chinese provinces with complete annual data on medical insurance and economic indicators from 2006 to 2021, yielding 496 province-year observations.
interventionGradual implementation of the policy of integration of medical insurance (2006-2021), with start-up dates varying from province to province. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes are natural logarithm of per capita medical insurance benefits for all residents, urban residents and rural residents. No secondary outcomes were predefined.
resultsOverall, the policy had a weak positive impact on the per capita benefits of rural residents. Subgroup analyses showed no immediate effect in provinces with a gross domestic product (GDP) per capita of more than 100 000 yuan, but an increase in benefits for rural residents 1 year after implementation; an immediate increase in rural benefits in provinces with a GDP per capita of 60 000-100 000 yuan; and a reduction in overall and rural benefits at the beginning in provinces with a GDP per capita of <60 000 yuan, followed by a restoration of rural benefits after 2 years. Mechanistically, the policy increased medical insurance coverage rates, but higher coverage was associated with short-term reductions in per capita benefits.
conclusionRegion-specific strategies need to be developed to provide lessons for developing countries pursuing universal health coverage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.