Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40829778›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2025

Comparative Evaluation of Toxicity End Points in Unicellular Bioassays for Environmental Pollutant Assessment.

Yan Wang, Johan Lundqvist, Nina Cedergreen

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yan WangDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, Frederiksberg 1871, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0942-2678
Johan LundqvistDepartment of Biomedicine and Veterinary Public Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7028, Uppsala SE-750 07, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5693-9007
Nina CedergreenDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, Frederiksberg 1871, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4724-9447

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aquatic environments contain mixtures of contaminants, of which many cannot be detected through conventional chemical monitoring. Effect-directed analysis (EDA) uses bioassays to detect bioactive compounds and relies on sensitive small volume assays. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of three unicellular species (

Indexed as

Biological AssayWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsEnvironmental MonitoringEscherichia coliSaccharomyces cerevisiaeToxicity TestsWastewaterWastewaterWater Pollutants, Chemicalbioavailabilitycellular bioassayin vitrosensitivityunicellular organisms

Identifiers

PMID40829778
PMCPMC12409895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.