Trial reportInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2026
Self-Perceived Hearing Outcomes With Radiation and Cisplatin or Radiation and Cetuximab for Patients With Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer-Results From NRG Oncology RTOG 1016.
Trial report in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cancer therapy-induced ototoxicity: Current challenges and emerging management strategies.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- Therapeutic resistance in HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: molecular mechanisms, clinical challenges, and precision strategies.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- Retrospective Trial on Cetuximab Plus Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer.Cancers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeRTOG 1016 was a noninferiority phase III trial comparing the efficacy of radiation with either cisplatin (RT + Cis) or cetuximab (RT + Cetux) for patients with Humman Papillomavirus (HPV)+ oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). Perceived hearing handicap was included as a patient-reported outcome (PRO) secondary endpoint. The primary hypothesis was that perceived hearing handicap would be greater for patients receiving RT + Cis compared with RT + Cetux. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Perceived hearing handicap was measured at baseline, end of treatment, and 3, 6, and 12 months posttreatment using the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults Screening Version (HHIA-S), a 10-item self-assessment questionnaire designed to measure patients' reactions to their hearing loss. Mixed ordinal logistic models were used to determine the treatment effect on HHIA-S scores and handicap categories (2-sided α = 0.05).
resultsThe PRO substudy included 375 eligible patients. No significant differences in patient/tumor characteristics were found between patients who participated in the HHIA-S study versus those excluded. For total HHIA-S scores and social and emotional subscales, RT + Cetux had significantly lower (ie, better) scores from end of treatment. Change score from baseline to end of treatment for RT + Cis (4.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.57-6.07]) was greater than RT + Cetux (0.08; 95% CI, -1.15 to 1.31). For hearing handicap category, RT + Cis had a significantly higher percentage of mild/moderate and severe cases at the end of treatment (32%) compared with RT + Cetux (20%) (P < .0001). Adjusted conditional odds of higher self-perceived hearing handicap category for RT + Cis compared with RT + Cetux was 3.73 (95% CI, 2.10-6.62).
conclusionPatients have significantly worse self-perceived hearing handicap after receiving RT + Cis treatment than with RT + Cetux. This was consistent across time through 1 year posttreatment. These findings inform hearing-related outcomes for patients with HPV-associated OPC and indicate the need for ototoxicity monitoring with RT + Cis treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.