ArticleClinical biochemistry2025
Gaps in guideline adherence: evaluating HLA-B*57:01 screening for abacavir sensitivity and the implementation of evidence-based HIV care.
Article in Clinical biochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveApproximately 5-8 % of the population carries the HLA-B*57:01 allele, which increases the risk of severe hypersensitivity reactions to abacavir. Current guidelines and an FDA black box warning recommend HLA-B*57:01 screening for all patients before starting abacavir. We assessed the proportion of patients who undergo screening before initiating abacavir to evaluate adherence to guidelines.
designA retrospective cohort study using national IQVIA® PharMetrics Plus reimbursement data.
methodsData from the 2014-2022 IQVIA® PharMetrics Plus March 2023 dataset were analyzed. We identified patients aged ≥ 18 years who were newly prescribed abacavir, with ≥ 12 months of continuous enrollment before their first abacavir prescription. We examined the proportion of individuals who received HLA-B*57:01 screening any time before their initial abacavir prescription and conducted a multivariable logistic regression analysis on the receipt of HLA-B*57:01 screening adjusting for sex, age, year, and region.
resultsWe identified 7,391 patients newly prescribed abacavir between 2014 and 2022. Approximately 46 % received an HLA-B*57:01 screen before initiation of abacavir. Annual screening rates ranged from 44 % to 50 % between 2015 and 2018 and dropped to 17 % by 2022. Screening was less likely to occur after 2018, compared to earlier in the study period, and more likely for younger as well as male patients.
conclusionsThese findings highlight broader challenges in HIV guideline adherence, emphasizing the need for ongoing evaluation and systematic interventions to improve implementation and patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.