Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40829663›Full record

ReviewProceedings. Biological sciences2025

Characterizing internal models of the visual environment.

Micha Engeser, Susan Ajith, Ilker Duymaz, Gongting Wang, Matthew J Foxwell, Radoslaw M Cichy, David Pitcher, Daniel Kaiser

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Micha Engeser *Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Physics, Geography, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, HE, Germany.
Susan Ajith *Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Physics, Geography, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, HE, Germany.
Ilker DuymazDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Physics, Geography, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, HE, Germany.
Gongting WangDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Physics, Geography, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, HE, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2364-0639
Matthew J FoxwellDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, UK.
Radoslaw M CichyDepartment of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
David PitcherDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, UK.
Daniel KaiserDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Physics, Geography, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, HE, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9007-3160

Funding

Deutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftEuropean Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the complexity of real-world environments, natural vision is seamlessly efficient. To explain this efficiency, researchers often use predictive processing frameworks, in which perceptual efficiency is determined by the match between the visual input and internal models of what the world should look like. In scene vision, predictions derived from our internal models of a scene should play a particularly important role, given the highly reliable statistical structure of our environment. Despite their importance for scene perception, we still do not fully understand what is contained in our internal models of the environment. Here, we highlight that the current literature disproportionately focuses on an experimental approach that tries to infer the contents of internal models from arbitrary, experimenter-driven manipulations in stimulus characteristics. To make progress, additional participant-driven approaches are needed, focusing on participants' descriptions of what constitutes a typical scene. We discuss how recent studies on memory and perception used methods like line drawings to characterize internal representations in unconstrained ways and on the level of individual participants. These emerging methods show that it is now time to also study natural scene perception from a different angle-starting with a characterization of an individual's expectations about the world.

Indexed as

EnvironmentVision, OcularVisual PerceptionHumansMemorydrawingsindividual differencesinternal modelspredictive processingscene representationvisual perception

Identifiers

PMID40829663
PMCPMC12364571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.