Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40829660›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025

Phenotypic selection gradients in a tripartite plant interaction in southern South America.

Florencia Soteras, Silvana Longo, Noelia Cofré, M Laura Bernaschini, Nicolás Marro, Julia Rodríguez, Margarita B Curá, Ricardo S Peralta Alderete, Santiago M Costas, Adrián Giaquinta and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Florencia SoterasInstituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV) - CONICET, FCEFyN, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba X5000OPB, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-2189-8529
Silvana LongoInstituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV) - CONICET, FCEFyN, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba X5000OPB, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-0193-940X
Noelia CofréInstituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV) - CONICET, FCEFyN, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba X5000OPB, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-5696-6598
M Laura BernaschiniInstituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV) - CONICET, FCEFyN, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba X5000OPB, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-2239-6328
Nicolás MarroInstituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV) - CONICET, FCEFyN, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba X5000OPB, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-4582-8453
Julia RodríguezInstituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV) - CONICET, FCEFyN, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba X5000OPB, Argentina.
Margarita B CuráInstituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV) - CONICET, FCEFyN, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba X5000OPB, Argentina.
Ricardo S Peralta AldereteInstituto de Investigacion Fisiologia y Recursos Geneticos Vegetales Ing Agr Victorio Segundo Trippi, Córdoba, Córdoba Province X5015AQO, Argentina.
Santiago M CostasInstituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV) - CONICET, FCEFyN, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba X5000OPB, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-9160-2917
Adrián GiaquintaInstituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV) - CONICET, FCEFyN, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba X5000OPB, Argentina.ORCID 0009-0007-7311-3363
Andrea A CocucciInstituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV) - CONICET, FCEFyN, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba X5000OPB, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-3464-3309
Corina VissioInstituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV) - CONICET, FCEFyN, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba X5000OPB, Argentina.ORCID 0009-0004-3920-258X
Gabriel GrilliInstituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV) - CONICET, FCEFyN, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba X5000OPB, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-0507-6229

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasFondo para la Investigación Científica y TecnológicaMinisterio de Ciencia y Tecnología del Gobierno de Córdoba GRFT 2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of how phenotypic selection by plant mutualists and antagonists varies within ecosystems is crucial for evaluating potential plant adaptations to changing environments, such as urban areas. Here, we describe the interaction intensity of plants with their mutualistic and antagonistic partners, as well as the selective landscapes in one natural and one urban site. We measured direct phenotypic selection on plant traits relevant to three interaction partners: floral tube length, resistance to herbivores and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) colonization. Significant direct phenotypic selection on the three interaction traits was detected in the natural site. We observed disruptive selection on floral tube length, with the two fitness optima closely matching the proboscis peak lengths of the main pollinator species. In addition, we observed stabilizing selection by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, favouring plants with around 11% of arbuscular colonization. This result supports the idea that plants may autoregulate mean intraradical arbuscular colonization to maximize fitness relative to carbon allocation to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Finally, we detected directional selection benefiting plants with high resistance to herbivores. Our results highlight the importance of adopting a multispecies, context-dependent approach to better understand the complex ecological interactions that drive plant evolution.

Indexed as

MycorrhizaeSelection, GeneticSymbiosisEcosystemHerbivoryPhenotypePollinationarbuscular mycorrhizal fungihawkmoth pollinatorsherbivoresnatural selectionurbanization

Identifiers

PMID40829660
PMCPMC12364580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.