ReviewJournal of critical care2026
Antimicrobial-coated endotracheal tubes: A narrative review.
Review in Journal of critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Role of antimicrobial peptide-based biomaterials in respiratory tract infections control.BMC microbiology · 2026Review
- Tackling Biofilm-Forming Pathogens: A Challenge to Overcome in the Fight Against Infectious Diseases.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Surfactant-Engineered Niosomal Antibiotic Systems for Biofilm-Associated Infections: Design Principles and Translational Perspectives.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionVentilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a significant source of morbidity and mortality. We sought to assess the current evidence on antimicrobial-coated endotracheal tubes (ETT) as one potential tool to break the cycle of colonization and infection among ICU patients.
methodsWe conducted a narrative review of available studies focused on the use of antimicrobial-coated ETTs to reduce VAP. The selection process adhered to PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
resultsA total of 58 studies met the inclusion criteria. Silver-based coatings were the most common, with 15 studies, including three randomized controlled trials and two systematic reviews. Of the 15 studies, 12 demonstrated a reduction in bacterial colonization. Two demonstrated delay of VAP onset and three demonstrated reduced VAP incidence. While one study determined there was a decreased mortality, three others determined no statistically significant difference could be proven in overall mortality, hospital stay. Additional research explored coatings composed of a noble metal alloy, zinc, selenium, antibiotics, biocides, and biomimetics. Novel surface modifications such as nano-roughening, micro-patterning, and photodynamic agents showed promise in preventing biofilm formation, though clinical validation remains limited.
conclusionsMany antimicrobial materials have undergone in vitro appraisal as potential ETT coatings to reduce VAP incidence, but only silver has been extensively tested in RCTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.